Saturday, June 21, 2008


100 Luquer Street, developer: Abe Klein


340 Court Street, Developer: Clarett Group

360 Smith Street/ 131 2nd Place, Developer: William Stein

Ms. Pardon Me For Asking's Easy Check List For Developers Who Are Currently Building Or Are Thinking About Building In Carroll Gardens:


* Respect The Carroll Gardens Neighborhood

*Respect The Residents


*Respect Their Residences


*Make My Buildings Fit Contextually Into This Brownstone Neighborhood


* Communicate With Residents


*Carroll Gardeners Are Smart, Treat Them Accordingly


* Don't Lie To Them


*Don't Forget That Carroll Gardeners Will Speak Out In Order To Protect Their Historical Brownstone Neighborhood




Below is an interesting article on the subject. It just appeared in The Real Deal.

In Carroll Gardens, neighborhood watch is for developers


Community activists reshape projects in Carroll Gardens



By Amy Miller


The gray, institutional-looking building that until recently sat at 340 Court Street in Carroll Gardens used to house the once-powerful International Longshoremen's Association.

But if the Clarett Group has its way, the aging building between Union and Sackett streets, which has already been demolished, will be replaced by a gleaming new 70-foot-high condo building with 30 to 40 new units.

The seven-story design is a scaled-back plan from Clarett's original vision. In many ways, the story of 340 Court Street encapsulates the neighborhood's real estate market, as ambitious developers trim their plans in the face of community opposition.

Even in a cooling market, Clarett is not the only one gambling on Carroll Gardens, a neighborhood that has managed to maintain some of its old-world Italian flair despite the hordes of young professionals and hipsters that have settled there.

Known for its limited inventory and established brownstone blocks, the area is also full of politically active neighborhood groups that closely watch empty lots and building applications submitted to the city.

Abe Klein is developing a 14-story condo at 100 Luquer Street. The Karl Fisher-designed tower is going up deep in the neighborhood, overlooking the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway. The building will have floor-to-ceiling glass on three sides and will include 20 condos.

The units are expected to go on the market this summer for between $755,000 and $850,000, Klein said. He added that neighbors haven't complained to his company, noting the buyers will probably be Wall Streeters who want to be close to the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel and BQE, and have easy access to work.

"I'm already getting calls," he said. "I don't think we will have a problem selling it, even in this market."

Yet on the Internet, the building's reception has been less than warm. On Curbed.com, the real estate site, the project has been dubbed the "Carroll Gardens Monstrosity." Readers have pointed out that even though the project is in a remote part of the neighborhood, the building is out of character with the four- to five-story buildings nearby.

Residents also rallied against a 49-unit project at 360 Smith Street, which is located near the Carroll Street subway station and is now under way in full force. The developer, William Stein, had originally tapped controversial architect Robert Scarano to design the glass-and-brick structure. But recently, Stein replaced Scarano with KSQ Architects and unveiled a scaled-down plan. That may have been in response to community activists, who seem to be effective at winning concessions.

But it's not just the building's design that has activists fuming. They're worried about losing a portion of the neighboring Smith Street Plaza to the project.

For the Court Street project, an online petition drive yielded nearly 1,100 signatures to push city officials to a impose a 50-foot-height restriction on all new construction in the neighborhood. In addition, neighbors registered 22 complaints with the Department of Buildings about construction at the site.

Those same locals also seem to have prompted the Clarett Group, which, according to city records, took out a $15.5 million mortgage on its property in February, to come forward with a proposal they hope will pass the community smell test.

The developers and architects faced about 200 mostly disgruntled residents at a public meeting in early April when they revealed designs for the project.

While a few residents thanked the developers for having the meeting, many walked away disappointed, Paul Nelson, chief of staff for state Assemblywoman Joan Millman said. Residents were particularly upset by the proposed condo's slate gray color, saying it would clash with the neighborhood's typically brown, earth-toned buildings.

"Many people were stunned by how dark it was," Nelson said. He added it was unclear whether Clarett representatives would appear at another public hearing.

Clarett declined to comment or provide artist renderings when contacted by The Real Deal, but officials there have said the project, designed by architect Rogers Marvel, will be seven stories rather than the allowable 21.

"The developers could have put up a 21-story building," Nelson said. "And we're very glad at least that they're not doing that. People feel very much under attack."

Clarett is also planning 14 four-story, single-family townhouses on Sackett and Union streets with relatively spacious front yards that fit in with the other homes in the neighborhood, Nelson said.

The project will also include ground-floor retail, which could reinvigorate the block. Nelson – who noted that nobody has seen the Clarett Group's renderings yet –said he is hoping the space is rented to a grocery story or post office.

Such big-time projects aren't the only ones drawing fire in Carroll Gardens. Angela Vita, owner and broker at Vita Real Estate on Court Street, said many residents are also angry about a seven-story brick condo at 11 2nd Place between Clinton and Henry streets.

Despite such neighborhood opposition, condo sales have been strong, suggesting that there is a market for this type of development.

The 11 condos on 2nd Place sold for between $600,000 for a one-bedroom unit and $1.3 million for the penthouse, Vita said. Also, all but two of the 18 condos at the recently completed Terraces on Court located at 529 Court Street have sold, Vita said in April. The last two apartments, both two-bedroom units in the five-story, beige-brick project, are on the market for $659,000.

Meanwhile, Vita said the owner of a parking lot at 260 Smith Street and Degraw Street plans to turn his property into a 44-unit residential project. But, she said he hasn't decided whether to rent or sell units. But, given that project's location, the Carroll Gardens community groups will likely weigh in on that decision, too.

"This is a very politically active community," Nelson said. "So if you're doing something wrong, you're going to hear about it. They love their neighborhood and just want to make sure everything has been done right."




For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Friday, June 20, 2008

photo credit: Carrie

Thanks to Carroll Gardens reader Carrie, who sent in this wonderful photo, I know that there are still residents in the neighborhood using the cloth lines in the back yard. How cool.
Here is what she wrote to me:


I enjoy checking in on your blog every morning and thought I would send you some visual reassurance and proof that the tradition of hanging laundry is alive in at least one corner of Carroll Gardens. I took this photo from my backyard today on President bet. Court and Clinton. You can see four of my neighbors utilizing solar and wind power to get their laundry dry. Admittedly the tenants of this building are neighborhood old-timers, but there are at least three (young "gentrifiers") in my own building who hang their laundry, too, they just didn't happen to have any out today. I am expecting a baby any day now and we are definitely putting up our own line so we can do some hand washing and sun-drying.


We wish you all the luck for the big event and hope that you will share a photo of your new Carroll Gardener with us all.



Related reading:

Let's Face It: Brooklynites Of Yesteryear Were Greener Than We Are

Picture Of The Day: Air Drying In Bay Ridge (Not Carroll Gardens)



Esposito's at 357 Court Street



The familiar pig with its faded and chipped paint



IMG_2141

After with a fresh coat of paint


First, a new awning and now, this!
A new shiny pig, too?
No, no, I was told.
It is just the old one, freshly painted.

But you know, dear reader?
I do think I liked it better before,
all weathered from years of welcoming customers on Court Street.






***UPDATE ON THE CLARETT SITE***


JUST ONE DAY AFTER THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DEVELOPER PROMISED TO KEEP LINES OF COMMUNICATIONS OPEN!



This just landed in my mailbox from a neighbor of the Clarett Site :

Is this a pile driver I see before me?


No! Just the biggest jackhammer you’re likely to run across, making my banister shake and the neighborhood rock ‘n roll,

Deceptive though it may be (The big machine has VOLVO written over it. You expect the operator to carry a briefcase and be reading The Times), it is still capable of shaking things up. Someone just started yelling at it, from the street, saying “Hey! Why are you doing this? It’s seven thirty in the morning! I know the feeling.

And then I remembered why I was particularly angered by this, recalling our meeting yesterday and some of the things said by Clarett/Monadnock. Reference was made to the “no pile driving” promises that were made, in the context of the need to put pilings along the sidewalk line. It was said b them that “when we said “no pile driving” of course we were referring to the site (as opposed to the sidewalk, one presumes). Much like the struggle we had over the difference between “building,” as in, “the building is only 70 feet tall,” and “structure”, as in “the structure will be 84 feet.”

Which brings me back to the big yellow Volvo hammer. Mention was also made, yesterday, about installing measuring devices, to meter the forces that will act upon all the buildings in the area. I was personally told these were being installed, by the engineering and survey company, months ago! Looks like they are planning to wait until all the heavy work is done, and then say, “Look, smooth as a baby’s bottom!”


Related reading:

Line Of Communication Not Really "Open" With Clarett Group Regarding 340 Court Street




For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking







The Clarett Group, developer of the 340 Court Street site had promise to keep the neighborhood informed! There was going to be a direct line of communication between developer and elected officials. But somehow, that line was never established or broke down early on, which left Carroll Gardens residents stuck in the middle, without information.
This was not the way it was supposed to be. On Wednesday, when fencing went up on the sidewalk, parking meters and parking spots were eliminated, all without prior notice, residents were angry.
Finally, yesterday morning, representatives of both the Clarett Group and of their construction company, Monadnock met with members of the Union-Sackett Group and representatives of our elected officials.
Assurances were given that things would improve in the future. The community can only hope.

Below are the minutes taken by a Union-Sackett Block Association member:


The Meeting, on 19 June, took place in front of “The Collection at Court”, The Clarett Group project at 340 Court St., Brooklyn. The meeting was called to discuss neighborhood alarm at the recent changes at the site, fencing of sidewalks, eliminating parking meters, etc., and the lack of responsiveness of various individuals and agencies, in addition to the empty assurances from Clarett of transparency.

The meeting began with the identification of several representatives from Monadnock , Greg Bauso, acting as spokespersons for the work on the site. They were joined by a Clarett representative.

There were expressions of dismay over the lack of notification to the community about the recent changes, and the project details as a whole, and those were countered by the assertion that the building process must be allowed to continue, and that compromises had been made that were in consideration of the community. The immediate issue of truck and pedestrian traffic around the site was discussed, and assurances were given by Monadnock that only a “limited number” of trucks would be brought to Court St., and that they would make every effort to avoid congestion in the area, or trucks simply waiting on the local approaches to the site.

The Clarett representative was asked about the appearance of the project, regarding finishes, colors, and materials, and he responded by saying that “they were still having trouble” in sourcing or identifying the exact materials to be used (a small variation on what we were told in the last public meeting with Clarett, quite some time ago). No substantive, additional details were given and no promise of availability of those details was made.

The Monadnock representatives were asked about the fill at the site (the issue being the possibility of asbestos or lead being in the “old fill” that was used when the ILA was built). They said that they would use “all available care” when removing or disturbing that fill. They were also asked about the excavation that was “inadvertently” made on the un-owned property at 288 Sackett (the 16 foot empty lot adjacent to 286 Sackett), and they said that they would “look into restoring the site.”

By the middle of next week, some significant shoring-up of the sidewalk all around the site will begin just inside the new fence. The contractor will put wooden piles in by various methods, drilling ,vibration, pounding to reinforce the road and sidewalk so they can do their new foundation. This will be more than 35 feet deep. By the middle of next week, Monadnock expects about 20 to 30 trucks per day to haul dirt off the site as they dig.

A repeat of the previous request for a “point person” at Clarett was made, and considerable discussion ensued regarding the issue of a lack of organization in communications. Among the political representatives, Deanna Bitetti , from Congresswoman Yvette Clarke’s office, volunteered to act a liaison for the various offices. It was not clear that Clarett would provide such a contact point.

Some mention was made in the difficulty that we’ve experienced in getting the various agencies; DOT; Buildings Dep’t, etc., to respond to requests for information and guidance, and it was suggested, by Deanna and others that we route our questions and concerns through their offices, always. Our concern, clearly expressed, was that some of these agencies seem unwilling or unable to respond, irrespective of the source of the questions.

Clarett was asked if they were still planning on having a loading dock on Sackett St., and they again stated that it was a requirement of the Buildings Dep’t. They were asked if they would support being given a variance for such a “loading dock”, the intent of the variance to minimize truck traffic on Sackett, and Clarett said that they would support such a variance. Several of those I attendance said they would ask DOB.



Related Reading:
Carroll Gardens Not Exactly Loving Clarett's 340 Court Street Design



For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Thursday, June 19, 2008


Meet Dolores
This is Dolores on the slide in Carroll Park in 1941 as a 19 month old. In the background is President Street, off Smith Street.  Notice the wooden slide.
Here she is in 1942 with Mrs. Viola, her mother.
The houses in the background are on Carroll Street,
looking towards Court Street. Some of the elm trees in the
photo are still standing today.
This is my favorite photo of Dolores, circa 1950.  It was taken along the Park on President Street.
Dolores as a 16 year old.
I wish I could have met her then.
I love the self-assured pose.
She is standing in what is now the park's ball field,
looking towards President Street.



These last three pictures are of Dolores in Carroll Park
in 1973 with her son Stephen.
The monument is still the same of course,
but notice the little fence around it.
In the back are the brownstones on President Street.

May I introduce you to my friend Dolores, who has lived in Carroll Gardens all her life? One of the greatest pleasures of living in this neighborhood is to sit on Dolores' stoop on a summer evening and to listen to her stories about growing up, marrying and raising a son right here in Carroll Gardens.

I could listen to her for hours. I consider it a privilege that she is sharing some of her earliest memories with me. Recently, when I mentioned to her that I wanted to document stories like hers, to hold on to the Carroll Gardens that she knew in her youth, she told me with a twinkle in her eye that she had old photos that she could show me.
So yesterday, Dolores delighted me with many wonderful pictures. I especially loved the ones that showed familiar places in the neighborhood. The photos above were all taken in Carroll Park, first, when Dolores was a baby and then, as a teen and finally, as a mother. I hope you enjoy them as much as I did.
And Dolores, my friend, thanks for sharing them!

Links to this post:

The New York Times: Money for nothing, and your tickets for free







Through the parlor floor windows
Of a brownstone on Union Street, near Smith.
A green gingerbread victorian
is the setting for quite
an elaborate affair.
A wedding, complete with bride and bridemaids.

Every few months, the scene in these windows will change.

Dear reader, please tell me, if you know, who is behind this window staging?


For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking