Wednesday, June 13, 2007


Hi guys,
Look, my better half is quoted on Gowanus Lounge. He is quite eloquent. Must be the Irish in him...


The big Carroll Gardens Issue
For all the discussion in Carroll Gardens about the building that will be built at 360 Smith Street, and its design and height, the bigger issues according to community leaders are rezoning the neighborhood and enlarging its Historic District. The rub, however, is that neither are likely to happen soon. Residents have been told by the Department of City Planning that it will be at least four or five years before the start of a Carroll Gardens rezoning process (which itself could take a year or quite a bit longer). Likewise, the process of expanding the neighborhood's two-block Historic District is likely to involve years of painstaking research.

"We can stomp our feet and snort and growl to try to create political pressure," said resident Glenn Kelly of the most likely way to try to get rezoning accomplished more quickly. Residents fear that parts of the community have a bull's eye drawn over them by developers because the current R6 Zoning makes it an appealing target for relatively high density development. Nearby neighborhoods like Park Slope, Fort Greene, Cobble Hill and Brooklyn Heights all have zoning which limit building height. R6 zoning doesn't limit height.

"We're very concerned right now," Mr. Kelly said. "There are some very large parcels of land available."

Tuesday, June 12, 2007



Last night was an eventful one at Scotto's Funeral Parlor, what with the Carroll Garden's Neighborhood Association's meeting about rezoning and the Smith Street Scarano debacle going on. Is ours the only community that holds its neighborhood meetings at a funeral home? I know this is Carroll Gardens and things are done differently here, but I just remember walking into what I though was a meeting once just to catch a glimpse of a dearly departed at the back of the room. Since then I have had an unsettled feeling everytime I attend a meeting of this worthwhile group. (Please someone: won't you offer them a more fitting meeting place? )
My husband was in attendance since he is pretty involved with C.G.N.A. Downzoning the neighborhood in time to save it from high-rises is high on his and the group's priority. But it seems that every time they try to move the agenda forward, it gets somehow tied in with the Gowanus Canal rezoning from manufacturing to residential. Funny how that works.
Our elected officials have a way of promising help with protecting C.G. in exchange for support in building high-rises along the shores of the canal. That is a clever ruse by our politicians, but a deal that C.G.N.A. should not make.
There are dark forces busy along the Gowanus. Developers are dreaming of making a fortune by building residential housing. Yes, I know, its all about the mighty dollar.
Of course there is the tiny little fact that most of the land is pretty much polluted and highly toxic. So this "brownfield" area first has to be cleaned up under the New York Brownfiled Cleanup program which give tax incentived to developers in exchange for cleaning the land. It may take awhile for all this to fall into place, but rest assured, the developers and the politicians already see a type of Battery Park along the Gowanus, high end condos starting at a "million five".
Problem is, under the New York Brownfield Cleanup Program, building condos on that land is forbidden. A friend who is very involved with this issue. sent me the link to the N.Y. Cleanut Program a while ago. If I am not mistaken, it is pretty clearly stated that no privately owned housing is to be sold on that land.
Here it is:
The New York Brownfield Cleanup Program
From an analysis made by the law firm Knauf and Shaw, LLP
"In 2003, the New York State Legislature created the Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP), which is primarily set forth in Title 14 of New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 27. The law, which is administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), provides a process for voluntary cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous waste or petroleum, rewarding the applicant with a liability release and tax incentives
Condominium and single-family residential home projects are not covered by the tax credits because the credits only apply to depreciable property. The legislative bill drafters did not want the credits to apply to “for sale” property, including condominiums and single-family residential homes, because they did not want developers constructing remedial systems that may operate for extended periods of time and pass on the responsibility to operate such systems to home owners. A legislative fix is not anticipated in the near term. However, the program can be used for residential apartment development, and commercial developments that are part of the same development projects. Condominiums can be constructed but the proportional share of the project attributed to the condominiums would lose the tax credits for the portion of the project. There is currently a controversy over whether the tax credits do apply to co-operative development projects where the developer still owns the real estate, but sells shares in the co-operative corporation. Confirmation from the state on the co-op issue is anticipated shortly since several developers may be filing petitions with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance to clarify the issue.

Now I don't know what all of this means, but reading the above passage makes me wonder if anyone has even considered this when dreaming about privately owned condos along the Gowanus. It sure sounds to me that only rental buildings and maybe co-ops may be allowed.
Does anyone out there have a better idea? And are the mighty forces of the Gowanus just ignoring this? Just asking!

Monday, June 11, 2007


To my local Brooklyn readers, you know about the punitive dismissal of some Community Board 6 members because they opposed the Atlantic Yards Mega Project. The three politicians who appoint members to the board, Marty Markowitz, Bill DeBlasio and David Yassky replaced nine members with people probably more inclined to embrace Bruce Ratner's monstro" city."
Of course the lesson to learn for our board members is that they better not cross the politicos who appoint them. And that they have just become useless to the community. They have just become yes-men. Under those conditions, can they even represent their community?
Now one brave board member, Joe Porcelli, is resigning in protest. And he would like other board members to follow suit. That is probably not going to happen, but in the meantime, Porcelli is the sole member who has any guts and conviction. Good for him.
I met Joe Porcelli once or twice when my husband and I were struggling to stop a local bar from illegally using their back yard. Joe was one of the only board members who took the time to speak with us and to give us some constructive advice. He was very knowledgeable and professional and took his role on the board very seriously, which immediatelly set him apart from some of the other 50 members. Too bad he will no longer serve in his capacity, but I truly respect him for resigning. Thank goodness some people still have strong personal convictions.

Related link
CB6 member to resign in protest: Says Marty’s purge makes boards “meaningless”
Lets face it: Mondays are tough. A little laughter can go a long way. Here is the best headline from The Onion, the best little spoof paper around.

Sunday, June 10, 2007



Great picture, but such a disturbing image, don't you think?
Yesterday was the annual flea market at Carroll Park. Moody teen son and I shared a spot and lugged our wares to the park. We were pretty successful. The house feels emptier already! We got rid of a few big items that were driving me crazy here in the house. If something is not used, get rid of it I say! It certainly was even nicer to get money for the stuff.
So of course the news item below caught my eye today. What with selling unused items. A sword once owned by Napoleon was recently auctioned of for mucho money. But leave it to the French. Whoevre bought this pricey little item has to keep it in France for six months out of the year. Lets hope a Frenchman bought it!




( The Blade of the sword was curved to make beheading swifter)

Napoleon sword sells for millions
from www.bbc.com

A gold-encrusted sword used by Napoleon has been sold at auction in France for 4.8m euros (£3.3m).
Auctioneers said the sword, used in battle some 200 years ago, achieved a world record for Napoleon memorabilia.
The sword, which belonged to eight of the emperor's descendants, was believed to be the last of Napoleon's blades in private hands.
The sword, which had only been expected to achieve some 1.2m euros was sold in the town of Fontainebleau, near a castle Napoleon used as a retreat.
"It's a world record for a souvenir of the emperor, for a sword and for a weapon in general," auction house spokesman Bernard Croissy said.
The inspiration for the sword's design is said to have come during Napoleon's Egyptian campaign.
He noticed that the swords used by the Arabs, which were also curved, were very effective in cutting off the heads of their French enemies.
The French general is said to have carried the sword into battle at Marengo in June 1800 - before he became emperor - when he launched a surprise attack to push the Austrian army out of Italy and seal a victory for France.
After the battle, Napoleon gave the sword to his brother as a wedding gift and it was then passed down the family through the generations.
The sword was declared a national treasure in 1978 and, while it may be sold to a foreign buyer, they must have a French address and keep it in France for six months a year.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

I think that Brooklynites knew all along that we were being lied to when it comes to the true cost of the Atlantic Yard Project.
Now the first reports of how much Ratner is getting from us to make himself richer are surfacing. It is also encouraging to see that the City's press is finally starting to investigate a bit more thoroughly into the details of this project.
Here are some very interesting articles on tax payers' contribution to Ratnerville.



N.Y. Magazine:You Are Helping Bruce Ratner Pay His Mortgage

Atlantic Yards Report:Huge deficit in tax exempt bonds may delay Atlantic Yards