Picture Of The Day: Dangerous Beauty

Terrifying beauty!
Pollutants on the surface
of the Gowanus Canal.

Taken on Valentines Day
February 14, 2010

For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

A Spot For The U.S. Census Being Shoot On Smith Street Tomorrow

Yellow fliers taped to street signs and parking meters on both sides of Smith Street indicate that there is no parking on Thursday, and Friday from 7 AM to 10 PM.

A call to 'Remote Productions' at the telephone number indicated on the flier revealed that the actual filming will take place tomorrow, Friday.

Remote Productions is doing an informational spot for the 2010 U.S. Census.




For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

Is Remedial Action At Gowanus Whole Food Site Starting In Earnest?

**IMPORTANT MEETING**

This just in from Community Board 6's Public Safety/ Environmental Protection/Permits/Licenses Committee. Representatives for Whole Foods are coming to the community on Monday, February 22 to speak about their Gowanus site and the remediation work which is currently going on.

On the agenda:

Presentation and discussion with representatives for Whole Foods on the resumption of environmental remediation activities at 210-230 3rd Street and 370-384 3rd Avenue (southwest corner 3rd Street/3rd Avenue).

Presentation and consideration of a letter of support for an application for a Gowanus Watershed Initiative grant that proposes various Combined Sewer Overflow reduction measures for the Gowanus Canal.

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

PS 32 Auditorium
317 Hoyt Street
between Union & President Street
Brooklyn NY 11231

At 6:30 PM

Please be sure to attend. This is bound to be an important and interesting meeting. And we should all stay involved in the future of the Gowanus Canal.

Related Reading:

Is Remedial Action At Gowanus Whole Food Site Starting In Earnest?

Heavy Duty Whacking And Chipping Action At Gowanus 'Whole Foods' Site

Gowanus Whole Foods Site Clean-Up Action To Begin In Early January 2010

For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

Final Submission Deadline For Brooklyn International Film Festival Approaching Fast

Nate Kensinger, Director Of Programming for the 13th Brooklyn International Film Festival, which will be held on June 4th to the 13th, 2010, sent an email to remind everyone that the final film submission deadline for this year's festival is coming up very soon.

He writes:

The final deadline for the Brooklyn International Film Festival is now one month away. If you know any filmmakers who you think should submit, definitely let them know!


Categories are : Feature, Documentary, Short, Experimental, Animation

Awards: $50,000 in services, products, and cash.

Final Deadline: March 17, 2010
(Entry Fee: $50. Deadline is "Postmarked by." Packages can be mailed until
the day of the deadline)

Film Festival Dates: June 4-13, 2010

+ click here for more info or to submit online
(http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/submit/)

So what are you waiting for. Send in your oeuvre!


For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

Comment Of The Day: Game Played By Politicians

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Park Slope Civic Council To Host Forum On The Future Of 4th Avenue":

Should be mentioned that the current head of Park Slope's Civic Council is a salesman with one of the area's commercial realtors. And sits on Community Board6's RE/land use committee..?

http://www.masseyknakal.com/people/KFreeman Until NYC provides clear leadership, it will be left for realtors/developers (who support local officials, elected and appointed) -- to do what they do, benefiting from zoning... in the short-term. And of course, the carousel of the game played by politicians -- that move their careers without ever having to answer for what goes on it their district, and spawn new politicians that try to own new versions of saying nothing, doing nothing, but wrapping it in a sincerity all their own. We've heard officials talk about street-scapes, boulevards and design in keeping with community needs, etc. etc. -- which serves to get heads nodding in meetings such as these.

And yet? we see a hodge-podge of whatever individual builders can get away with... and a line-up of officials ready to blame someone else, or something in the past. Local officials will 'finesse' any meetings they attend -- and say what should be done, and what 'they'll fight for' (over and over). They'll point fingers at Developers, which is like blaming a horse for where it takes your cart. The end is that the joke will always be on us, until we all demand better. Start by not even allowing any elected officials to even speak.

For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

The Gowanus Bridge Fixers: Is NYC D.O.T. Thinking Of "Fixing" The Union Street Draw Bridge?

Gowanus Canal Union Street Bridge Closure
February 20, 27 & March 6, 13, 2010
7Am-3PM

The New York City Department of Transportation Division of Bridges announced that the Union Street Draw Bridge over the Gowanus Canal will be closed during four consecutive Saturdays, starting this Saturday.
Repairs will be made to the bridge's structural grating deck.

The Union Street bridge is one of five bridges crossing the Gowanus Canal, which was once a bustling commercial waterway.

But is New York City planning on turning the "double leaf Scherzer rolling lift bascule" bridge into a fixed bridge?

Late in 2009, the US Army Corps Of Engineers contacted the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is currently deciding whether to place the dangerously polluted canal on its list of Superfund sites. The Corps informed the EPA that New York City had reached out to the Corps to share its intent to convert the Union Street Bridge from a draw bridge into a fixed one.
The Corps inquired if such a move would interfere with the E.P.A.'s efforts to clean the Gowanus Canal, should it be designated as a Superfund.

In a response, the EPA Region 2 office informed the Corps that:
"a fixed bridge would impede investigation and cleanup work that is anticipated to take place in the entire Canal over the next several years."

The Region 2 office also kindly requested the Corps to forward "for comment any formal proposal that you receive from New York City for changes on the status of this bridge or any other bridge in the Gowanus Canal."

Though there is no evidence that the upcoming work on the bridge includes the conversion to a fixed bridge, one has to wonder if these repairs will lead to that and if the work is meant to throw obstacles in the way of a thorough clean-up by the EPA. At the very least, the timing seems suspect.
The City has lobbied very hard against the EPA's Superfund designation for the canal, claiming that it can clean up the toxic waterway to the same level as the Federal Agency. That is rather unlikely.



Below are some fantastic photos of a tug boat going through the Gowanus Canal more than twenty years ago. They were taken by Phyllis Wrynn, Director of the Park Slope Gallery. I would like to thank her for sending them to me.

In background: Union Street Bridge opened to make way for tugboat

Opened Carroll Street Bridge

***UPDATE***

I just received the email below from the District Manager of Community Board 6, Craig Hammerman. Thanks for the clarification, Craig.

Hi Katia

The Department of Transportation's Division of Bridges has had a Union Street Bridge Capital project on the books for a number of years now which we were aware of through our annual budget consultation with the agency. However, the project has not been formally scoped or designed, and at last report from the department is in the City's 10-year plan for Fiscal Year 2017 construction, with an approximate budget of $26.3 million. They envision a 24-month duration project that essentially would entail a comprehensive rehabilitation of the bridge structure, operator house and bridge approaches. We have not held any meetings since the department is not ready to come to us to finalize the scope of the project.

The City must consider as part of any Bridge Rehabilitation Project the full range of alternative construction scenarios from "No Action" to "Full Replacement" to determine which approach is cost-justified and sufficient to address any known defects. One such scenario considered for all movable bridges is whether or not to convert it to a fixed bridge, given ongoing maintenance and operation costs versus existing and projected need, traffic and environmental impacts, etc.

The City alone would not be able to decide whether to change a movable bridge to a fixed bridge if it is over a navigable waterway. The City is required to get permission from the Federal government, through the U.S. Coast Guard, and would likely be required to develop a full Environmental Impact Statement as part of that process. The development of an EIS would alert the community and provide an opportunity to comment on the proposed Scope of the draft EIS as part of the permitting process.

Also, as part of the planning process, the City is required to apply for a permit from the Coast Guard to construct or reconstruct bridges over navigable waterways. As part of that process, the Coast Guard is obligated to consult with an obtain comments from any federal agency with legal jurisdiction or special expertise concerning any environmental or navigational impact involved. That's what brought the USACE and USEPA and possibly others into the picture.

(The Coast Guard Bridge Administration Division has a Bridge Permit Application Guide available on their website at http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg5411/BPAG_2008.pdf )

It would seem that the City was performing its due diligence in having a preliminary discussion with the Coast Guard about the range of Capital construction options and that during the consultative process that followed the Coast Guard informed the City that repurposing the Union Street Bridge from a movable to a fixed bridge was simply not an option. The matter, I'm told, had to be considered, was quickly ruled out, and is not being seriously considered.

When DOT is ready to formalize the scope of work and pursue the design for the project, they are required to consult the affected Community Board (City Charter, Section 222). We will host a presentation and discussion with them at that time, as we had previously done for the replacement of the 9^th Street Bridge and the replacement of the Hamilton Avenue Bridges.

I hope you find this helpful and that you'll update your blog to provide the additional information. Certainly, when I hear more news about this I will be sure to keep you informed!

For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More

A Moment In Time: The Morning Coffee

On some mornings,
that first cup of java
seems even more important
than on others.

This morning was one of them.

Wouldn't you agree?

For Home Page, click Pardon Me For Asking

Read More